To be read following: THE BIG DOUGHNUT THEORY MKII (Or THE LONG SAUSAGE ROLL THEORY) Now, those Sausage Rolls without their sausage Their pastry long, and smooth and glossy Described how there had never (EVER) been The need for a - “BIG BANG” - To start this mess that we’re in (THE UNIVERSE!) - In fact I can think of nothing much worse Than a “BIG BANG” to start off a whole Universe! - Therefore, and in keeping with my original theory (Regarding the general distribution of matter) Without any need for a “BIG BANG” TO SPLATTER' - Our cosmic dust into a great space (That had waited how long?) For this event to take place I return to my doughnut The original plan (Remember the type with a hole, and no jam) But to make it much clearer (ie the system we’re in) I have added another element; - REVOLUTION (or SPIN) - For if our doughnut were of - “UNIVERSAL” - Proportions In the form of a vacuum with matter within - (analogy DOUGH) - In view of it’s totally enormous - CIRCUMFERENCE - It’s speed could then vary - (IF IT WERE TO SPIN) - For when “Spun” on it’s axis at slow revolutions It’s centre could seem to be totally still Whilst an object attached to it’s outer circumference Much faster than light might travel - UNTIL - The dough at it’s surface grew darker and darker (Just like night) As it's speed prevented the escape of all - LIGHT - I would then suggest that this may be the answer For the reason there exists such a mass of - “DARK MATTER” - Though It Does not result from ANY - “BIG SPLATTER” - But merely because; - WHEN A BIG DOUGHNUT SPINS - Light cannot escape - SO SOME BITS GO DIM ! - So you see (Although on the EDGE you will not) - POSITION - Determines our SPEED in this plot And as SPEED is as TIME (Just in case you’d forgot) The “SPIN” is the reason; WE ARE and NOT NOT! - Egal Bohen March 2008 |
Thursday, 13 March 2008
The Big Bang -v- The Big Doughnut Theory MkIII (Or what happens when a Big Doughnut Spins)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
*chuckling*
I'm suddenly hungry for a donut.
Wonder why that is! ;-)
Nice to see you scribing again, sir.
Mel, You are very polite, thankyou - I think though it is more a case of "scribblings"!
Egal..
LOL One man's scribbling's is another man's scribings?
;-)
Mel, You are right... and actually it is the "scribing" out of spinning circles that is at the "heart" of my ridiculous theory (Which I only wrote to provoke further investigation!)
Egal..
Post a Comment